That test is ridiculous, I tested as more libertarian than Ghandi and the Dalai Lama...how the hell does that happen?

funny though

Apparently I am Ghandi.

Alithea wrote:

Apparently I am Ghandi.

Same here.

This is me.

Well not really. The wording of some questions were such that I picked the opposite of what I normally would.

I don't know anything about political stances anyway.

Last edited by Ragnarok (05-22-2007 11:18:26 PM)

I'm around where Ghandi is.

I'm not ashamed to admit given wealth, my political compass would be a bit different.

I did the test twice, once in English and once in Spanish... and it gave me different results
So in English I am like Yasha , and in Spanish I am Gandhi.

Not bad at all


PS. Definitely, if I were a wealthy multinational director my answers would have been very different

Edit: some weeks ago, I did this test: http://www.revistaperfiles.com/pages/haz-nuestro.php. It's similar but a little more complex, I think. Only in Spanish, sorry! However, I thought I could share.

Last edited by Asfalolh (05-23-2007 04:08:34 AM)

Is anyone else severely depressed that all the brilliant minds on this forum are on the precisely opposite side to the major political leaders of our world?

Also, I make Ghandi look like a grumpy old conservative, if my test score is to be believed.

What?  Am I the furthest right out of all of us?  Granted, I am a Republican, but I'm the good kind of Republican - no religion rules my politics.  I figured being an Utena forum, we'd be populated with mostly left, but still.  I thought there'd at least be one person further right than me.  Dude, the closest one of you to me is Yasha.  Murr.

I'm a Republican because I am economically conservative.  I have severe issues with public assistance and how people take advantage of it.  I have issues with the rich supposedly getting taxed a higher percentage because they make more (everyone should be taxed the same damn percentage).  In all honesty, I'm a liberaterian given m,y economic conservatism and social liberalism, but I refuse to give up my party for one that practically ndoesn't exist.  Besides, in general I can't stand most Democrats and the Democratic party makes me feel slightly more ill than my own does.  If you take away ther religious extremists that have become teh voical portion of the Republican party and look at the "silent majority" the party is still good and still, in my opinion, the better of the two.  And if I leave the GOP because of the religious morons running it, all I'm doing is allowing an unneccesary evil to persist.  IUt may not seem like it, but eventually the Republicans will go back to having a seperation of church and state and the federal government will stop trying to tell states what to do.  The Republican party today (the vocal side) is not what the Republican party used to be, is supposed to be, and will always be.

I don't really know much about politics and I don't like any human political system anyway.  Nevertheless, this is my result.  I guess I'm close to the Pope. XD

BTW, I'm not a Democrat. I might maybe be a Lolbertarian if there were any point to it, instead I'm registered Independent.

Stormcrow wrote:

P.S.  Who does everybody like in 2008?

GoDaddy wrote:

VOTEAKIOIN08.COM is available!

I've been thinking about it for years.

Seriously, none of them. None of the forerunners, anyway. Clinton and Obama can both bugger off. When it's time for a female president, I'd prefer she not be one riding in on her husband's coat tails. Obama? Same problem. First black president should be elected because he's worth electing, not because he's Not Republican. And that, along with his being black, is all I've seen from him. On the other end there's Giuliani, who is actually probably my closest match on most of the issues, since he's the most liberal person running. However...well Chris Rock put it best:

Chris Rock on Bill Maher wrote:

Rudy, you know, Rudy in a crisis is the perfect — he’s like a pitbull. It’s great if somebody’s breaking in your house. But if they’re not, then, you know, the pitbull might eat your kids.

I also want out of Iraq, and we ain't gonna get that out of Giuliani, even if we get gay marriage. That said there is a bit of sadistic appeal in electing someone with a name most of the American population can't spell. Still, I just can't imagine the rural south voting for someone from New York City. I don't care who they are or how well they did post-9/11.

I'm pretty sure I'd be a republican if any of the republicans in any  of the elections I've voted in didn't seem like they were just kowtowing to fundies. As far as I'm concerned a few horribly designed social programs are a lot better than a freaking theocracy.

I'm a little more fiscally conservative than Ghandi, it seems. D: