This is a static copy of In the Rose Garden, which existed as the center of the western Utena fandom for years. Enjoy. :)

#1 | Back to Top06-05-2007 09:14:28 PM

Sevelle
Yaoi Pet #2
From: Virginia the Great
Registered: 11-07-2006
Posts: 1615

The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

So strangely enough, this morning I was watching the 700 Club (I know right, "he must've been bored out of his mind", you say.) Anyways the segment I caught was really rather strange, the Democratic Candidates were being interviewed on the religious front . . .

They of course asked them the obvious few topics: abortion, homosexual marriage, and what do you believe. These were all just blurred together, so you really did not catch their full stance on each. I did catch that Edwards does not believe homosexuals should marry, but have civil unions. ((Douche! And he’s handsome!)); Obama quoted something from Abraham Lincoln and the Bible; and Hilary prayed.

What was more odd was this same “caucus” showed up on the National News . . . Though they dwelled more into their personal views on faith in politics. Mentioning that Democrats seemed to target the religious black demograph than the Evangelicals, however since the Republican’s have yet to have a clear candidacy its open season.

My whole view on the issue is; I am bloody fucking frightened! Why? Because Religion and Politics DO NOT MIX! And the older I get, the more is seems religion is clenching more and more down on the Government. Religion, at least in my view, is something rock solid and never changes. However a Government should be like Jell-O and ever changing. It should be fluid, to be blunt.

I guess I picture the worst, the whole 1984 type world (seeing as I’ve been re-reading it) void of hope and freedom.

*Ugh*

If I hear one more right-winged ranting about “God says this” or “ The Bible says that”, I’ll scream and hide.


sometimes you make me feel
like I’m living at the edge of the world
"it's just the way I smile"
you said

Offline

 

#2 | Back to Top06-05-2007 09:18:52 PM

alexielnet
Unfulfilled Juror
From: Arizona
Registered: 10-16-2006
Posts: 236
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

And so God saidith on to the world, "I have a fever, and the only cure is more cowbell," and so there was and so it was good.

Offline

 

#3 | Back to Top06-05-2007 09:20:52 PM

Romanticide
Cow Bellhop
From: Mazatlan
Registered: 10-18-2006
Posts: 447

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Sevelle wrote:

My whole view on the issue is; I am bloody fucking frightened! Why? Because Religion and Politics DO NOT MIX! And the older I get, the more is seems religion is clenching more and more down on the Government. Religion, at least in my view, is something rock solid and never changes. However a Government should be like Jell-O and ever changing. It should be fluid, to be blunt.

I guess I picture the worst, the whole 1984 type world (seeing as I’ve been re-reading it) void of hope and freedom.

*Ugh*

If I hear one more right-winged ranting about “God says this” or “ The Bible says that”, I’ll scream and hide.

Wow... never thought the USA had som many problems with religion...  funny enough as even if Mexico population is mostly Catholic (Catholic apostolic roman, not baptists, protestants and the such) we got rid of the church medling in the goverment... like a century ago... with a small burst on the twentys... but people take as a given that those things don't mix...

Good look with that... those problems can cause civil wars...


http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1390/firmautenaji0.jpg

Offline

 

#4 | Back to Top06-05-2007 09:43:49 PM

Stormcrow
Magical Flying Moron
From: Los Angeles
Registered: 04-24-2007
Posts: 5971
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Even in America, Catholics tend to be democrats.  So it doesn't surprise me that a Catholic nation wouldn't have such a religious government.

I try to be tolerant, but I cannot escape the conclusion that organized religion has waged a relentless and single-minded war against the idea of America.  If you don't believe me, just take out a dollar bill and read over it.  "In god we trust" must be on all US currency, by law.  I'm not sure how that fits in with "Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion", maybe someone could explain that one to me?  Organized religion has even managed to convince most people that the USA was founded as a Christian nation, have you heard them say these things?  Vicious, wicked lies.  Of the founding fathers, only John Adams was a Christian at all.  America was conceived as a nation where people could carry out their lives in freedom.  Read just about anything by Thomas Jefferson on the subject.  Or Thomas Payne, Benjamin Franklin, George Washington, James Madison, etc.

And if anyone doesn't believe that religion and politics make a dangerous mix, take a closer look at Iran.

EDIT: I just looked over that beautiful first amendment again...it's important to realize that at the time this was written, there was nothing like it in the entire world.  Especially freedom of religion, it simply did not exist in that form.  Some would say that it still doesn't.  Why don't we respect it anymore? emot-frown

Last edited by Stormcrow (06-05-2007 10:03:58 PM)


"The devil want me as is, but god he want more."
-Truck North
Honorary Hat Mafia Member

Offline

 

#5 | Back to Top06-05-2007 09:55:01 PM

Sevelle
Yaoi Pet #2
From: Virginia the Great
Registered: 11-07-2006
Posts: 1615

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Romanticide wrote:

Sevelle wrote:

some words by me.

Wow... never thought the USA had som many problems with religion...  funny enough as even if Mexico population is mostly Catholic (Catholic apostolic roman, not baptists, protestants and the such) we got rid of the church medling in the goverment... like a century ago... with a small burst on the twentys... but people take as a given that those things don't mix...

Good look with that... those problems can cause civil wars...

Yeah, I know.


sometimes you make me feel
like I’m living at the edge of the world
"it's just the way I smile"
you said

Offline

 

#6 | Back to Top06-05-2007 10:26:24 PM

Romanticide
Cow Bellhop
From: Mazatlan
Registered: 10-18-2006
Posts: 447

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Sevelle wrote:

Romanticide wrote:

Sevelle wrote:

some words by me.

Wow... never thought the USA had som many problems with religion...  funny enough as even if Mexico population is mostly Catholic (Catholic apostolic roman, not baptists, protestants and the such) we got rid of the church medling in the goverment... like a century ago... with a small burst on the twentys... but people take as a given that those things don't mix...

Good look with that... those problems can cause civil wars...

Yeah, I know.

aghhh luck I mean luck... well never lose your eyes on it... in case war starts and you need to get out of the country... if you need to take  refuge on Mexico you are welcome in my house XD

Last edited by Romanticide (06-05-2007 10:27:11 PM)


http://img156.imageshack.us/img156/1390/firmautenaji0.jpg

Offline

 

#7 | Back to Top06-05-2007 10:27:05 PM

Sevelle
Yaoi Pet #2
From: Virginia the Great
Registered: 11-07-2006
Posts: 1615

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

It's called Europe!

emot-biggrin

France to be precise!


sometimes you make me feel
like I’m living at the edge of the world
"it's just the way I smile"
you said

Offline

 

#8 | Back to Top06-05-2007 10:57:25 PM

Giovanna
Ends of the Fandom
From: Edmonton, AB
Registered: 10-12-2006
Posts: 8797
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Shit, we don't have the right emoticon for that.

http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q60/mrsakioohtori/emot-jerkbag.gif

...

Oh who am I kidding. Get me out of America please. http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q60/mrsakioohtori/emot-suicide.gif


Akio, you have nice turns of phrase, but your points aren't clear and you have no textual support. I can't give this a passing grade.
~ Professor Arisa Konno, Eng 1001 (Freshman Literature and Composition)

Offline

 

#9 | Back to Top06-05-2007 11:03:12 PM

satyreyes
no, definitely no cons
From: New Orleans, Louisiana
Registered: 10-16-2006
Posts: 10328
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

The worst part is how some hardcore religious people feel so bloody disenfranchised!  If someone suggests taking "under God" out of the Pledge of Allegiance, RELIGION IS UNDER ATTACK!!!  If a judge finds that the Ten Commandments might not be the most appropriate monument to put in front of a courthouse, THE LIBERALS ARE TRYING TO DESTROY CHRISTIANITY!!!  And oh, don't forget how MY CHILDREN ARE NOT ALLOWED TO PRAY IN SCHOOL!!!  (Totally untrue.  Your children can pray wherever they want; the government-employed teacher simply can't lead the class in prayer.)  If I had a half hour of prime-time TV some Friday evening, I would consider using it to try to explain, as calmly and compellingly as I could, that there is a difference between public life and private life, and that religion should be firmly part of the latter.

I dearly wish the Framers had just written the phrase "separation of church and state" into the Constitution, rather than leaving us with the more spinnable "Congress shall make no establishment of religion."  That said, I'm cautiously optimistic that the wall will hold for the foreseeable future.  The Democratic candidates kowtowed to militantly religious folk the other night, but they don't mean it; they're hypocrites, not fanatics.  As for the Republicans, the only deep religious right candidate who's credible right now is Mitt Romney, and he's the wrong religion; he won't get elected.  And even if a strongly pro-religion president does get elected, the Constitution has proven to be a pretty sturdy piece of paper.  Cautiously optimistic.

Offline

 

#10 | Back to Top06-05-2007 11:09:34 PM

rhyaniwyn
Myth is my Bitch
From: Tallahassee, FL
Registered: 11-09-2006
Posts: 684
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

"America in my own time line suffered the cancer of 'Bread and Circuses' but found a swifter way to commit suicide.  I don't boast about the difference, as in time line two the people of the United States succumbed to something even sillier than Bread and Circuses: The people voted themselves a religious dictatorship.

"It happened after 1982, so I did not see it--for which I am glad!  When I was a woman a hundred years old, Nehemiah Scudder was still a small boy.

"The potential for religious hysteria had always been present in the American culture, and this I knew, as my father had rubbed my nose in it from an early age.  Father had pointed out to me that the only thing that preserved religious freedom in the United States was not tolerance ... but was solely a Mexican standoff between rival religious sects, each sect intolerant, each sect the sole custodian of the 'One True Faith' -- but each sect a minority that gave lip service to freedom of religion to keep its own 'One True Faith' from being persecuted by all the other 'True Faiths.'

"(Of course it was always open season on Jews and sometimes on Catholics and almost always on Mormons and Muslims and Buddhists and other heathens.  The First Amendment was never intended to protect such outright blasphemy.  Oh, no!)

"Elections are won not by converting the opposition but by getting out your own vote, and Scudder's organization did just that.  According to histories I studied at Boondock, the election of 2012 turned out 63 percent of the registered voters (which in turn was less than half of those eligible to register); the True American party (Nehemiah Scudder) polled 27% of the popular vote ... which won 81 percent of the Electoral College votes.

"In 2016 there was no election."

To Sail Beyond the Sunset, Robert Heinlein

Last edited by rhyaniwyn (06-05-2007 11:11:50 PM)


http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o165/absolethe/itrg_signature.jpg

Offline

 

#11 | Back to Top06-05-2007 11:13:57 PM

Sevelle
Yaoi Pet #2
From: Virginia the Great
Registered: 11-07-2006
Posts: 1615

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

satyreyes wrote:

"separation of church and state"

The funny thing about that is, the founding fathers wrote that not to protect the Church . . . but the State.

*ahahaha*

Was it not Ben Franklin who went to orgies and parties dedicated to anti-christianity? Or at least that is what I got from that History Channel thing of Satanism.


sometimes you make me feel
like I’m living at the edge of the world
"it's just the way I smile"
you said

Offline

 

#12 | Back to Top06-05-2007 11:22:46 PM

rhyaniwyn
Myth is my Bitch
From: Tallahassee, FL
Registered: 11-09-2006
Posts: 684
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Most of the founding fathers weren't Christian (no matter how much some politicians like to pretend otherwise), but there was a not-inconsiderable number of deeply religious people who came to America to escape persecution by their government...and their official state religion.

Freedom of religion is good for everyone.  Protecting the state from the church protects all churches from the state.  I have no idea why some segments of the Christian majority have so much trouble believing and respecting that truth.

As someone who loves religion, but is not religious, I can only suppose that the religious fervor is doing its job too well.  A fanatic can't really take "all things in moderation."

And as a "custodian of the 'One True Faith'", of course, it's their responsibility to run this Christian nation according to Christian morals--to protect all of our souls.  It's for the best, really.  I just can't appreciate it because I'm a heathen.

Last edited by rhyaniwyn (06-05-2007 11:24:44 PM)


http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o165/absolethe/itrg_signature.jpg

Offline

 

#13 | Back to Top06-06-2007 12:12:54 AM

ShatteredMirror
Yaoi Pet #1
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: 10-22-2006
Posts: 8858

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

...I never understood the assholes who think that Christians are being persecuted in the United States. Right now, the first amendment is there to protect everyone else from us (Christians, that is), but a hundred years from now we may very well be the ones that need protecting.

And as long as teachers are permitted to give pop quizzes there will be prayer in schools.


Pride is not the opposite of shame, but its source.

Offline

 

#14 | Back to Top06-06-2007 04:49:24 AM

Asfalolh
Knight of Gates
From: Barcelona (Catalonia)
Registered: 10-23-2006
Posts: 2005

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

To be honest, I always thought that all the reports of America turning into "ultra-religiousness" were over-exaggerating... but this thread tells me I was mistaken. From a foreigner, and I know you are pretty aware of what is happening:

- Money with the motto "In God we trust"? emot-aaa Seriously... Spain used to be quite Catholic until 1975 -end of dictatorship-, with church being more and more powerful; now I live in an a-confessional state who still finances some of the Catholic hierarchy, but there is a growing conscience that it has to end soon (unfortunately, it still represents a loss of votes for any candidate, so no one is really doing it until, say, 2050 or such). Coins used to have the inscription "Franco, por la gracia de Dios, caudillo de España" (Franco, by God's will, commander of Spain). I assure you these words can cause a commotion on most of elder people nowadays, despite them being believers.

- A little more history: Spanish Catholicism (as in Mexico, population is 90% catholic apostolic roman) was separated from Government in 1930. It returned only when a fascist dictator (Francisco Franco) reached the power in 1939 and until his death in 1975. I know America is a democracy, an old and quite profound one. You can be proud of it. But there are these little things -or not so little- that make the world wonder about the US and contribute to anti-Americanism. Mr. Bush, or any American for that matter, can pray three hours a day; it's fine! But as rhyaniwyn says, the founding fathers of the nation were not Christian nor intended to create America as the last bastion for Christianity.

- You have a fantastic first amendment, as Stormcrow says. But if it's not enough for the ultra-religious ones who think as Church and State were called to become a unity, you please remind them of Mt 22,21 "Give therefore to Caesar the things that are Caesar’s, and to God the things that are God’s."

- Experience show that Church is not bad per se (thanks God! emot-tongue). But since we entered XXIst century it is always fearing its own fading, so it’s always asking for more presence in everyday life. You finance them? They will ask for religious formation in school. You think it is ok (it is!)? They now ask for prayers during lessons, or as lessons. More? Next step is asking for a crucifix in every class. And so on. Last step: burn Muslims, homos, women, and atheists. (Ok, that may sound disproportionate, but we all know how it works)

Didn’t want to sound too pessimist. I just hope American society will be capable to return to the freedom that made your country what it is. I don’t think it is necessary to become as laic as France; maybe that will be too much of a change. I strongly believe aconfessionality is a good mid-point.

Edit: corrected some mistakes. Thank you satyreyes!

Last edited by Asfalolh (06-06-2007 12:29:50 PM)

Offline

 

#15 | Back to Top06-06-2007 06:19:05 AM

Stormcrow
Magical Flying Moron
From: Los Angeles
Registered: 04-24-2007
Posts: 5971
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Sevelle wrote:

satyreyes wrote:

"separation of church and state"

The funny thing about that is, the founding fathers wrote that not to protect the Church . . . but the State.

*ahahaha*

Was it not Ben Franklin who went to orgies and parties dedicated to anti-christianity? Or at least that is what I got from that History Channel thing of Satanism.

Well, he was known as the father of France...I guess he was pretty busy over there emot-biggrin

EDIT:  If people can interpret "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion" into meaning it's okay to pass laws putting "under god" into literature and "in god we trust" on money, they'd have gotten around "separation of church and state" almost as easily.  That first clause of the first amendment is broad and sweeping.  I almost wonder if people don't understand the words anymore?

I recently read a study that more than half of high school students in this country thought that the first amendment protections went too far...emot-gonk

Last edited by Stormcrow (06-06-2007 06:24:52 AM)


"The devil want me as is, but god he want more."
-Truck North
Honorary Hat Mafia Member

Offline

 

#16 | Back to Top06-06-2007 06:36:29 AM

Asfalolh
Knight of Gates
From: Barcelona (Catalonia)
Registered: 10-23-2006
Posts: 2005

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Stormcrow wrote:

I almost wonder if people don't understand the words anymore?

I fear you are right wondering.


I recently read a study that more than half of high school students in this country thought that the first amendment protections went too far...emot-gonk

I'm not sure if I understand what do you mean. +50% of high school students think that government is over-protecting the observance of the first amendment?
But why should they believe so?

Offline

 

#17 | Back to Top06-06-2007 06:39:07 AM

Stormcrow
Magical Flying Moron
From: Los Angeles
Registered: 04-24-2007
Posts: 5971
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

No, it's the amendment itself that they thought went too far.  If I remember correctly, it was the free speech part specifically.  I'm guessing that their parents/teachers/talking heads on TV have told them that we need to give up our freedoms to be safe from the terrorists, or some equally stupid bullshit.


"The devil want me as is, but god he want more."
-Truck North
Honorary Hat Mafia Member

Offline

 

#18 | Back to Top06-06-2007 06:45:10 AM

Asfalolh
Knight of Gates
From: Barcelona (Catalonia)
Registered: 10-23-2006
Posts: 2005

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Ok, I understand now emot-keke

Actually, this issue is also being discussed in Europe. People think freedom of speech is not important enough to let it put their lifestyle in a teorical danger (see, when you don't like or even fear the person who is speaking).
Personal freedom is having a bad time, I guess.

Edit: I don't believe that anything can be said with impunity (impunely, does this word exist?), sure.

Last edited by Asfalolh (06-06-2007 06:50:41 AM)

Offline

 

#19 | Back to Top06-06-2007 08:25:20 AM

hyacinth_black
une personne horrible
From: Waiting at the window.
Registered: 10-21-2006
Posts: 3301
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

alexielnet wrote:

And so God saidith on to the world, "I have a fever, and the only cure is more cowbell," and so there was and so it was good.

And at God's good worde, the cowbell rang out triumphantly in peals of glorious cacophany.  And yea, God said unto Abraham, "I can't hear you, could you speak INTO the microphone this time?"


http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r216/hyacinth-black/woops.gif
Hyacinth Black: Not much else to say, is there?

Offline

 

#20 | Back to Top06-06-2007 08:37:22 PM

Sevelle
Yaoi Pet #2
From: Virginia the Great
Registered: 11-07-2006
Posts: 1615

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

You know I have never really thought about it until now, but now that several of you mention Christians are pulling "persecuted" card . . . Has the burning ages completely slipped their mind? Now that I think about it, it’s really funny. Because out of all the great things Christians stand for, they never mention the darkest eras under their belts.

PS: And that goes for any power in power. The darkness never exists.


sometimes you make me feel
like I’m living at the edge of the world
"it's just the way I smile"
you said

Offline

 

#21 | Back to Top06-06-2007 09:13:51 PM

rhyaniwyn
Myth is my Bitch
From: Tallahassee, FL
Registered: 11-09-2006
Posts: 684
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Actually, within 70 years of the Edict of Milan, Christians began persecuting pagans.  I know people didn't live quite as long then, but you'd think the memory would be fresh...


http://i120.photobucket.com/albums/o165/absolethe/itrg_signature.jpg

Offline

 

#22 | Back to Top06-06-2007 09:18:04 PM

Sevelle
Yaoi Pet #2
From: Virginia the Great
Registered: 11-07-2006
Posts: 1615

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Crazy peoples hiding behind a mask!


sometimes you make me feel
like I’m living at the edge of the world
"it's just the way I smile"
you said

Offline

 

#23 | Back to Top06-06-2007 11:44:12 PM

ShatteredMirror
Yaoi Pet #1
From: Sacramento, CA
Registered: 10-22-2006
Posts: 8858

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

Burning heretics? Never happened. What are you talking about. Using the charge of being a witch to foster class struggles and grab property? What are you talking about?

It's sad. Religion is an organization... and it's misused as often as it's used well.


Pride is not the opposite of shame, but its source.

Offline

 

#24 | Back to Top06-10-2007 02:04:59 PM

Persephone
Memorial Hollerer
From: Edge of the Light
Registered: 01-31-2007
Posts: 687
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v118/monomana/colbert_truthinesstopower.jpg


It's just time to be
sammy to the rasoodock.
And close up the business
of heart-related matters.

Offline

 

#25 | Back to Top06-10-2007 02:07:00 PM

hyacinth_black
une personne horrible
From: Waiting at the window.
Registered: 10-21-2006
Posts: 3301
Website

Re: The Political Agenda . . . of Democrats?


http://i145.photobucket.com/albums/r216/hyacinth-black/woops.gif
Hyacinth Black: Not much else to say, is there?

Offline

 

Board footer

Powered by PunBB 1.2.23
© Copyright 2002–2008 PunBB
Forum styled and maintained by Giovanna and Yasha
Return to Empty Movement